Analyst Earnings Forecast Revisions and the Pricing of Accruals

Mary E. Barth () and Amy P. Hutton ()
Additional contact information
Mary E. Barth: Stanford University
Amy P. Hutton: Dartmouth College

Review of Accounting Studies, 2004, vol. 9, issue 1, No 3, 59-96

Abstract: Abstract We investigate the relation between two market anomalies to provide insights into analysts’ role as information intermediaries. Prior research finds that accruals and analyst earnings forecast revisions predict future returns. We find that the accrual and forecast revision strategies generate hedge returns of 15.5% and 5.5% when implemented independently. Strikingly, a combined strategy that uses forecast revisions to refine the accrual strategy generates a hedge return of 28.5%. Firms with consistent accrual and forecast revision signals have less persistent accruals and earnings. We also find that accruals can be used to refine the forecast revision strategy—high accruals are associated with overoptimism in analyst forecasts. Our findings indicate that although forecast revisions reflect information about accrual and earnings persistence beyond that reflected in the level of current year accruals, investors do not fully incorporate this information into their valuation assessments.

Keywords: accruals; analysts; pricing anomaly (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1023/B:RAST.0000013629.59222.df Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:9:y:2004:i:1:d:10.1023_b:rast.0000013629.59222.df

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/accounting/journal/11142

DOI: 10.1023/B:RAST.0000013629.59222.df

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Accounting Studies is currently edited by Paul Fischer

More articles in Review of Accounting Studies from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().