Derisking the low-carbon transition: investors’ reaction to climate policies, decarbonization and distributive effects
Irene Monasterolo (),
Nepomuk Dunz,
Andrea Mazzocchetti () and
Régis Gourdel
Additional contact information
Irene Monasterolo: EDHEC-Risk Institute
Nepomuk Dunz: World Bank
Régis Gourdel: Vienna University of Economics and Business
Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, 2022, vol. 3, issue 1, 31-71
Abstract:
Abstract The role of climate finance policies and instruments in scaling up and derisking low-carbon investments has received growing research attention. However, financial actors’ reaction to climate finance initiatives, and their implications on decarbonization of the economy and on inequality, has not been assessed yet. Our manuscript contributes to address this knowledge gap by analysing under which conditions government’s climate finance policies and investors’ climate risk adjustment can affect the success of the low-carbon transition and the ability to close the green investment gap. We further develop the EIRIN Stock-Flow Consistent behavioural model with a financial market, an energy market and investors’ portfolio choice of financial contracts, for the European Union. First, we study the macroeconomic impacts of government’s green subsidies that can be financed either by introducing an unanticipated carbon tax or by issuing green sovereign bonds. Then, we assess how investors adjust firms’ risk assessment in reaction to the carbon tax introduction, and how this affects firms’ low-carbon investment decisions. We find that both a carbon tax and green bonds financing can give rise to trade-offs in terms of decarbonization of the economy (absolute emission reductions), distributive effects and public debt sustainability. The channels of transmission differ and are policy and instrument specific. Green subsidies that are financed by green sovereign bonds issuance generate positive spillovers on GDP growth and less distributive effects than a carbon tax. Nevertheless, due to the relative decoupling of the economy, GDP growth impairs emission reduction efforts. Finally, investors’ climate risk adjustment helps to smooth this trade-off, contributing to a full decoupling.
Keywords: Climate finance; Carbon tax; Green bonds; Decarbonization; Climate risk adjustment; Distributive effects; Stock-Flow Consistent model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E40 E44 E47 G21 Q01 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43253-021-00062-3 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:revepe:v:3:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s43253-021-00062-3
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.springer.com/journal/43253
DOI: 10.1007/s43253-021-00062-3
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Evolutionary Political Economy is currently edited by Wolfram Elsner
More articles in Review of Evolutionary Political Economy from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().