Analyzing international organizations: How the concepts we use affect the answers we get
Charles B. Roger () and
Sam S. Rowan ()
Additional contact information
Charles B. Roger: Institut Barcelona d’Estudis Internacionals (IBEI)
Sam S. Rowan: Concordia University
The Review of International Organizations, 2022, vol. 17, issue 3, No 8, 597-625
Abstract:
Abstract We explore how “international organizations” have been conceptualized and operationalized in the field of International Relations (IR), identify an important gap between the two, and demonstrate how this shapes our understanding of world politics. Traditionally, we show, IR has embraced a broad conception of international organizations (IOs) that appreciates variation in design. However, the literature has largely coalesced around a measurement standard that reflects the characteristics of major postwar IOs. Prevailing measures, therefore, mainly count formal IOs—bodies founded with legally binding agreements—and omit informal IOs, which are founded with non-binding instruments. We argue that this produces a disconnect between theory and empirical evidence used in the field, since scholars frequently make arguments about IOs in general but draw inferences from formal IOs only. After reviewing how this disconnect has emerged, we use an original dataset on state membership in 260 informal IOs to reanalyze a number of important studies, showing heterogeneous effects for subtypes of IOs that conflict with existing theories to varying degrees. These differences imply that formal and informal IOs have different effects and that existing findings in the field are partly artifacts of the specific way IO variables have been operationalized by scholars. Based on this, we offer recommendations for how to improve research practices moving forward.
Keywords: International cooperation; International organizations; Institutional design; Legalization; Formality; Informality; Socialization; Democratization; Global environmental politics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F50 F53 F55 K33 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11558-021-09432-2 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:revint:v:17:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s11558-021-09432-2
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... iology/journal/11558
DOI: 10.1007/s11558-021-09432-2
Access Statistics for this article
The Review of International Organizations is currently edited by A. Dreher
More articles in The Review of International Organizations from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().