From Direct SMEs’ Support to Entrepreneurship Policy in Russia: Why Do Regional Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Matter?

V. A. Barinova () and Stepan Zemtsov
Additional contact information
V. A. Barinova: Laboratory for Sustainable Development Studies, Institute of Applied Economic Research, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Regional Research of Russia, 2023, vol. 13, issue 3, 440-457

Abstract: Abstract Traditional approaches to entrepreneurship support prevail in Russia. Significant amounts of direct federal support are allocated to small and medium enterprises (SMEs), but their role in the economy is consistently low. Public support imposes a weak impact on the SMEs development in comparison with macroeconomic and institutional factors. However, the support has increased significantly during the pandemic. We show that direct financial support is not always efficient, especially in developing countries. The aim of the article is to propose an alternative entrepreneurship policy for Russia and other countries, based on creation of favourable business environment in regions and cities, networks of business agents and proactive public support system considering specifics of regional entrepreneurial ecosystems. The article formulates the principles and goals of the ecosystem approach. The approach involves cooperation of local stakeholders and evaluating the support measures’ efficiency to reduce transaction costs for business agents and creating the motivation for growth and diversification. The work identifies the best practices in Russia and abroad. Previous policy in Russia does not fully comply with the principles and goals of the ecosystem approach: local authorities and business agents are not sufficiently involved, do not always consider regional specific, some measures create the wrong incentives for business agents, and some support institutions are not opened enough to public control. We proposed an appropriate typology of regional entrepreneurial ecosystems, based on the mentioned goals and principles, for a more differentiated entrepreneurship policy. There are several successful regional practices of SMEs’ development (Belgorod, Voronezh, Kaliningrad, Leningrad, Lipetsk, Novosibirsk, Samara, and Tyumen oblasts, Moscow, St. Petersburg, the Republic of Tatarstan), that can be distributed within similar types of ecosystems.

Keywords: small and medium business; business environment; state support; regional policy; typology; Russian regions; institutions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S2079970523700776 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:13:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1134_s2079970523700776

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.springer ... cience/journal/13393

DOI: 10.1134/S2079970523700776

Access Statistics for this article

Regional Research of Russia is currently edited by Vladimir M. Kotlyakov and Vladimir A. Kolosov

More articles in Regional Research of Russia from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().