Spatial Factors of Conflict Potential in the Use of Urban Symbolic Geopolitical Capital in Russia

K. E. Aksenov ()
Additional contact information
K. E. Aksenov: St. Petersburg State University, Institute of Earth Sciences

Regional Research of Russia, 2024, vol. 14, issue 1, S139-S149

Abstract: Abstract The purpose of the work is to identify spatial factors of conflict potential in the use of urban symbolic geopolitical capital in Russia, which is understood here as a set of accumulated geopolitical meanings (connotations) of the city, territories and individual places. The symbolic resources of the environment, namely, urban signs or symbol carriers have unique properties that give an advantage to the actors of symbolic politics who use them in the competitive struggle. The meanings, values and emotions that these symbols and signs are endowed with can have both positive and negative connotations in the perceptions of different groups. The same symbol (historical person or event) can have opposite connotations in different places. These features are actively used in symbolic politics at different spatial levels. Out of more than a hundred cases of modern conflicts using geopolitical symbols and memorial signs dedicated to them in Russian cities collected from media materials, 20 were analyzed in the work with a special methodology, relating to the symbols of the pre-socialist era and the period of the Civil War and foreign intervention of 1917–1922. The work presents an analysis of the significance of various local geopolitical symbols and signs for the formation of geopolitical symbolic capital and its use in modern Russian urban and regional symbolic policy both in constructive and creative practice, and in conflicted interactions and even destructive practices. It is concluded that location changes the substance of conflict over local geopolitical symbols and signs in accordance with the following factors: confinement of events associated with the symbol to the place; presence and features of settlement pattern of conflicting identities/social groups associated with the symbol; characteristics of public exposure and potential audience reach; competitiveness of the place; hierarchy of locations; spatial structure of ownership, and relations with regards to power and influence.

Keywords: symbolic politics; critical geopolitics; urban conflicts; identity; politics of memory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S2079970524600628 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:14:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1134_s2079970524600628

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.springer ... cience/journal/13393

DOI: 10.1134/S2079970524600628

Access Statistics for this article

Regional Research of Russia is currently edited by Vladimir M. Kotlyakov and Vladimir A. Kolosov

More articles in Regional Research of Russia from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().