Man on Territory: Spatial Analysis in the Research of the Novosibirsk Economic–Sociological School

E. E. Goryachenko (), T. Yu. Cherkashina (), N. L. Mosienko (), K. V. Malov () and O. P. Fadeeva ()
Additional contact information
E. E. Goryachenko: Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
T. Yu. Cherkashina: Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
N. L. Mosienko: Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
K. V. Malov: Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
O. P. Fadeeva: Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Regional Research of Russia, 2024, vol. 14, issue 2, S175-S186

Abstract: Abstract This article examines the history of research by the Novosibirsk Economic–Sociological School (NESS) in the field of analysis of social problems of territories from the early 1960s to the present. The logic and main stages of the development of the NESS are shown in the works of its founders, successors, and modern researchers. The consistent transformation of both the complex of problems studied and the sociological tools used is considered. The analysis of the problems of migration between rural areas and cities and the development of a typology of rural settlements were subsequently supplemented by studies of the processes of urbanization and spatial mobility of the population and then by a systematic study of the socioterritorial structure of Soviet and Russian society. The stable features of the NESS are noted, traced in the works of authors of different generations, devoted to spatial mobility and the functioning of socioterritorial structures. These include the use of a systems approach to setting objectives and designing research projects; the use of complementary data sources; conceptual differences from the political mainstream, allowing researchers to draw conclusions that do not always coincide with government policy and the current conjuncture; a desire to use the latest tools for collecting and analyzing sociological data; and a desire to be included in the global context.

Keywords: Novosibirsk Economic–Sociological School; rural–urban migration; spatial mobility; socioterritorial structure; local territorial community (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S2079970524600823 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:14:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1134_s2079970524600823

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.springer ... cience/journal/13393

DOI: 10.1134/S2079970524600823

Access Statistics for this article

Regional Research of Russia is currently edited by Vladimir M. Kotlyakov and Vladimir A. Kolosov

More articles in Regional Research of Russia from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().