EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A propensity score approach in the impact evaluation on scientific production in Brazilian biodiversity research: the BIOTA Program

Fernando A. B. Colugnati (), Sergio Firpo, Paula F. Drummond Castro, Juan E. Sepulveda and Sergio L. M. Salles-Filho
Additional contact information
Fernando A. B. Colugnati: University of Campinas
Paula F. Drummond Castro: University of Campinas
Juan E. Sepulveda: Institute of Economics/UNICAMP
Sergio L. M. Salles-Filho: University of Campinas

Scientometrics, 2014, vol. 101, issue 1, No 5, 85-107

Abstract: Abstract Evaluation has become a regular practice in the management of science, technology and innovation (ST&I) programs. Several methods have been developed to identify the results and impacts of programs of this kind. Most evaluations that adopt such an approach conclude that the interventions concerned, in this case ST&I programs, had a positive impact compared with the baseline, but do not control for any effects that might have improved the indicators even in the absence of intervention, such as improvements in the socio-economic context. The quasi-experimental approach therefore arises as an appropriate way to identify the real contributions of a given intervention. This paper describes and discusses the utilization of propensity score (PS) in quasi-experiments as a methodology to evaluate the impact on scientific production of research programs, presenting a case study of the BIOTA Program run by FAPESP, the State of São Paulo Research Foundation (Brazil). Fundamentals of quasi-experiments and causal inference are presented, stressing the need to control for biases due to lack of randomization, also a brief introduction to the PS estimation and weighting technique used to correct for observed bias. The application of the PS methodology is compared to the traditional multivariate analysis usually employed.

Keywords: Quasi-experiment; Propensity score; Impact evaluation; Biota program; Bibliometrics; 62P25 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-014-1397-1 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:scient:v:101:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1397-1

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11192

DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1397-1

Access Statistics for this article

Scientometrics is currently edited by Wolfgang Glänzel

More articles in Scientometrics from Springer, Akadémiai Kiadó
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().

 
Page updated 2020-08-27
Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:101:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1397-1