Prospective evaluation of the accessibility of Internet references in leading general medical journals

Paula A. Rochon (), Wei Wu, Jerry H. Gurwitz, Sunila R. Kalkar, Joel Thomson and Sudeep S. Gill
Additional contact information
Paula A. Rochon: Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital
Wei Wu: Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital
Jerry H. Gurwitz: University of Massachusetts Medical School
Sunila R. Kalkar: SRK Informatics
Joel Thomson: Pixelligent
Sudeep S. Gill: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences

Scientometrics, 2015, vol. 102, issue 2, No 14, 1375-1384

Abstract: Abstract This study prospectively evaluates the accessibility of Internet references in leading general medical journals and explores the impact of their lost accessibility. We identified all original contributions published in five leading peer-reviewed traditional general medical journals and one leading on-line journal that were published at two time points (January 2005 and January 2008). We followed the sample prospectively for 5 years and determined the number of Internet references that remained accessible. Our sample of 165 original contributions contained 154 Internet references. Accessibility to Internet references declined from 51 % after 4 years to 37 % after 8 years in the articles published in January 2005, and decreased from 78 % after 1 year to 44 % after 5 years in the articles published in January 2008. Among those Internet references published in the most highly-cited articles, only 19 % (95 % CI 10–35 %) remained accessible in March 2013. Among the Internet references cited in the Methods section of the articles, only 30 % (95 % CI 20–43 %) remained accessible. Of the 91 Internet references which were no longer accessible at the end of the follow-up period, 39 (43 %) were assigned a rating of either ‘important’ or ‘very important’. Accessibility of Internet references declines substantially over time most often because the information is updated or the sites become unavailable. Accessibility remains poor even among those Internet references that are most important.

Keywords: Internet references; Medical journals; Accessibility (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-014-1489-y Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:scient:v:102:y:2015:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1489-y

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11192

DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1489-y

Access Statistics for this article

Scientometrics is currently edited by Wolfgang Glänzel

More articles in Scientometrics from Springer, Akadémiai Kiadó
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().