EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Assessing the maturity of a research area: bibliometric review and proposed framework

Heather Keathley-Herring (), Eileen Van Aken, Fernando Gonzalez-Aleu, Fernando Deschamps, Geert Letens and Pablo Cardenas Orlandini
Additional contact information
Heather Keathley-Herring: University of Central Florida
Eileen Van Aken: Virginia Tech
Fernando Gonzalez-Aleu: Universidad de Monterrey
Fernando Deschamps: Pontifical Catholic University of Parana
Geert Letens: Royal Military Academy
Pablo Cardenas Orlandini: Virginia Tech

Scientometrics, 2016, vol. 109, issue 2, No 16, 927-951

Abstract: Abstract In recent years, many disciplines have begun to adopt more systematic and standardized approaches to evaluate the impact and development of a research area with a stronger emphasis on quantitative techniques. In particular, identifying and analyzing the published literature have become important exercises for many disciplines and methods such as systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis have become more regularly used to obtain a deeper understanding of a research area. One concept that is of particular interest is the maturity, or level of development, of a research area. While this concept has been mentioned in many works, it has not yet been formalized, resulting in a lack of consensus concerning the definition of research area maturity and analysis techniques to assess maturity. Therefore, most assessments of research area maturity consider only a subset of the possible criteria with significant differences in the metrics and analyses used among different disciplines. Due to the inconsistencies in the definition and assessment of this concept, a comprehensive synthesis of this literature area is needed. This paper presents the results of a study to identify and analyze the literature, define the maturity of a research area, and synthesize the criteria for assessing maturity. The results are used to develop a generalized maturity assessment framework that establishes a comprehensive set of criteria, which can be adapted for use across a variety of research areas.

Keywords: Research area; Maturity; Systematic literature review; Conceptual framework; Bibliometric analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (29)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-016-2096-x Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:scient:v:109:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-016-2096-x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11192

DOI: 10.1007/s11192-016-2096-x

Access Statistics for this article

Scientometrics is currently edited by Wolfgang Glänzel

More articles in Scientometrics from Springer, Akadémiai Kiadó
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:109:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-016-2096-x