EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Mapping technology space by normalizing patent networks

Jeff Alstott (), Giorgio Triulzi (), Bowen Yan and Jianxi Luo
Additional contact information
Jeff Alstott: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Bowen Yan: Singapore University of Technology and Design
Jianxi Luo: Singapore University of Technology and Design

Scientometrics, 2017, vol. 110, issue 1, 443-479

Abstract: Abstract Technology is a complex system with technologies relating to each other in a space that can be mapped as a network. The technology network’s structure can reveal properties of technologies and of human behavior, if it can be mapped accurately. Technology networks have been made from patent data using several measures of proximity. These measures, however, are influenced by factors of the patenting system that do not reflect technologies or their proximity. We introduce a method to precisely normalize out multiple impinging factors in patent data and extract the true signal of technological proximity by comparing the empirical proximity measures with what they would be in random situations that remove the impinging factors. With this method, we created technology networks, using data from 3.9 million patents. After normalization, different measures of proximity became more correlated with each other, approaching a single dimension of technological proximity. The normalized technology networks were sparse, with few pairs of technology domains being significantly related. The normalized network corresponded with human behavior: We analyzed the patenting histories of 2.8 million inventors and found they were more likely to invent in two different technology domains if the pair was closely related in the technology network. We also analyzed the patents of 250,000 firms and found that, in contrast with inventors, firms’ inventive activities were only modestly associated with the technology network; firms’ portfolios combined pairs of technology domains about twice as often as inventors. These results suggest that controlling for impinging factors provides meaningful measures of technological proximity for patent-based mapping of the technology space, and that this map can be used to aid in technology innovation planning and management.

Keywords: Technology; Networks; Patents; Invention; Technology diversification (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-016-2107-y Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:scient:v:110:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-016-2107-y

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11192

Access Statistics for this article

Scientometrics is currently edited by Wolfgang Glänzel

More articles in Scientometrics from Springer, Akadémiai Kiadó
Series data maintained by Sonal Shukla ().

 
Page updated 2017-10-06
Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:110:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-016-2107-y