Scholarly impact assessment: a survey of citation weighting solutions
Liwei Cai,
Jiahao Tian,
Jiaying Liu,
Xiaomei Bai,
Ivan Lee,
Xiangjie Kong () and
Feng Xia
Additional contact information
Liwei Cai: Dalian University of Technology
Jiahao Tian: Dalian University of Technology
Jiaying Liu: Dalian University of Technology
Xiaomei Bai: Anshan Normal University
Ivan Lee: University of South Australia
Xiangjie Kong: Dalian University of Technology
Feng Xia: Dalian University of Technology
Scientometrics, 2019, vol. 118, issue 2, No 4, 453-478
Abstract:
Abstract Scholarly impact assessment has always been a hot issue. It has played an important role in evaluating researchers, scientific papers, scientific teams, and institutions within science of science. Scholarly impact assessment is also used to address fundamental issues, such as reward evaluation, funding allocation, promotion and recruitment decision. Scholars generally agree that it is more reasonable to use weighted citations to assess the scholarly impact. Although a great number of researchers use weighted citations to access the scholarly impact, there is a lack of a systematic summary of citation weighting methods. To fill the gap, this paper summarizes the existing classical indicators and weighting methods used in measuring scholarly impact from the perspectives of articles, authors and journals. We also summarize the focus of the indicators involved in this paper and the weighting factors that involved in the weighting methods. Finally, we discuss the open issues to try to discover the hidden trends of citation weighting. Through this paper, we can not only have a clearer understanding of the weighting methods in the scholarly impact assessment, but also think more deeply about the weighting factors to be explored.
Keywords: Weighted citations; Scholarly impact assessment; Weighting factors (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-018-2973-6 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:scient:v:118:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-018-2973-6
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11192
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-018-2973-6
Access Statistics for this article
Scientometrics is currently edited by Wolfgang Glänzel
More articles in Scientometrics from Springer, Akadémiai Kiadó
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().