What might get published in management and applied psychology? Experimentally manipulating implicit expectations of reviewers regarding hedges

Nida ul Habib Bajwa, Markus Langer (), Cornelius J. König and Hannah Honecker
Additional contact information
Nida ul Habib Bajwa: Universität des Saarlandes
Markus Langer: Universität des Saarlandes
Cornelius J. König: Universität des Saarlandes
Hannah Honecker: Universität des Saarlandes

Scientometrics, 2019, vol. 120, issue 3, No 18, 1371 pages

Abstract: Abstract Researchers’ careers depend on publishing papers. There are explicit expectations (e.g., paper structure) that affect editors’ and reviewers’ perceptions of manuscripts and therefore chances of publishing papers that can be easily conveyed in written feedback. However, previous research uncovered that some expectations could be rather implicit, thus reviewers and editors might not be aware that those may affect their perceptions of manuscripts. Specifically, the use of hedges (i.e., words that create vagueness; e.g., “the results show” vs. “the results might show”) seems to be expected by editors and reviewers of high impact management and applied psychology journals. However, previous work did not investigate causality of hedges on publishing recommendations. The current experiment introduced reviewers (N = 96) from top-tier journals from psychology and management with one of two versions of an introduction differing in the use of hedges. Results provide first evidence that authors’ use of hedges impacts reviewers’ recommendation for publication and suggest that this expectation is rather implicit. Moreover, the findings call for research on implicit expectations in the publishing process, may have important consequences for reviewers’ and editors’ awareness of this topic, and raise attention in novice and international researchers to subtle aspects of language that might influence chances of publishing.

Keywords: Publishing process; Hedging; Implicit expectations; Academic writing; Meta-research (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-019-03164-2 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:scient:v:120:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-019-03164-2

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11192

DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03164-2

Access Statistics for this article

Scientometrics is currently edited by Wolfgang Glänzel

More articles in Scientometrics from Springer, Akadémiai Kiadó
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().