EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Characterizing human summarization strategies for text reuse and transformation in literature review writing

Kokil Jaidka (), Christopher S. G. Khoo () and Jin-Cheon Na ()
Additional contact information
Kokil Jaidka: Nanyang Technological University
Christopher S. G. Khoo: Nanyang Technological University
Jin-Cheon Na: Nanyang Technological University

Scientometrics, 2019, vol. 121, issue 3, No 16, 1563-1582

Abstract: Abstract Citations are useful signals of information salience, but little research has identified the patterns of information selection, transformation, and organization that they espouse. This paper investigated the summarization strategies followed in the writing of literature review sections of information science research papers. We found that the summarization strategies followed are different for the two major styles of literature review writing, descriptive versus integrative literature reviews. Descriptive literature reviews, which focus on individual descriptions of research papers, are more likely to reference the Method and the Result sections of the cited paper and copy-paste text the referenced text. In contrast, integrative literature reviews, which synthesize the main ideas for many papers together, have more critiques and focus mainly on the Conclusion sections. These findings, based on a hand-annotated dataset, have the potential to scale up into a transformation-invariant neural architecture for scientific summarization that can generate different summaries of the input text with integrative or descriptive characteristics.

Keywords: Literature review writing; Scientific summarization; Discourse analysis; Citance; Abstracting; Citation analysis; 62H20 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-019-03250-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:scient:v:121:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-019-03250-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11192

DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03250-5

Access Statistics for this article

Scientometrics is currently edited by Wolfgang Glänzel

More articles in Scientometrics from Springer, Akadémiai Kiadó
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:121:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-019-03250-5