The hurdles of academic publishing from the perspective of journal editors: a case study

Maciej J. Mrowinski (), Agata Fronczak (), Piotr Fronczak (), Olgica Nedic () and Aleksandar Dekanski ()
Additional contact information
Maciej J. Mrowinski: Warsaw University of Technology
Agata Fronczak: Warsaw University of Technology
Piotr Fronczak: Warsaw University of Technology
Olgica Nedic: Institute for the Application of Nuclear Energy (INEP), University of Belgrade
Aleksandar Dekanski: Institute of Chemistry, Technology and Metallurgy - Department of Electrochemistry, University of Belgrade

Scientometrics, 2020, vol. 125, issue 1, No 5, 115-133

Abstract: Abstract In this paper, we provide insight into the editorial process as seen from the perspective of journal editors. We study a dataset obtained from the Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society, which contains information about submitted and rejected manuscripts, in order to find differences between local (Serbian) and external (non-Serbian) submissions. We show that external submissions (mainly from India, Iran and China) constitute the majority of all submissions, while local submissions are in the minority. Most of submissions are rejected for technical reasons (e.g. wrong manuscript formatting or problems with images) and many users resubmit the same paper without making necessary corrections. Manuscripts with just one author are less likely to pass the technical check, which can be attributed to missing metadata. Articles from local authors are better prepared and require fewer resubmissions on average before they are accepted for peer review. The peer review process for local submissions takes less time than for external papers and local submissions are more likely to be accepted for publication. Also, while there are more men than women among external users, this trend is reversed for local users. In the combined group of local and external users, articles submitted by women are more likely to be published than articles submitted by men.

Keywords: Peer review; Editorial process; Publishing; Submissions analysis; Editor workload (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-020-03619-x Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:scient:v:125:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-020-03619-x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11192

DOI: 10.1007/s11192-020-03619-x

Access Statistics for this article

Scientometrics is currently edited by Wolfgang Glänzel

More articles in Scientometrics from Springer, Akadémiai Kiadó
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().