The ethics of scientific recommender systems
Andrea Polonioli ()
Additional contact information
Andrea Polonioli: Coveo Solutions Inc
Scientometrics, 2021, vol. 126, issue 2, No 41, 1848 pages
Abstract:
Abstract Scientific recommender systems have become increasingly popular as a tool to overcome information overload, allowing researchers to access fresh and relevant content. However, this article presents an analysis of the most pressing ethical challenges posed by recommender systems in the context of scientific research. In particular, it is argued that scientific recommender systems may risk isolating scholars in information bubbles and insulating them from exposure to different viewpoints. Further, they also risk suffering from popularity biases which may lead to a winner-takes-all scenario and reinforce discrepancies in recognition received by eminent scientists and unknown researchers. The article concludes with recommendations for scientists, journals, and digital libraries to facilitate progress in the study of the ethics of scientific recommender systems.
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-020-03766-1 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-020-03766-1
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11192
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-020-03766-1
Access Statistics for this article
Scientometrics is currently edited by Wolfgang Glänzel
More articles in Scientometrics from Springer, Akadémiai Kiadó
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().