Collaborations in communication: Authorship credit allocation via a weighted fractional count procedure

Darrin J. Griffin (), Zachary W. Arth, Samuel D. Hakim, Brian C. Britt, James N. Gilbreath, Mackenzie P. Pike, Andrew J. Laningham, Fareed Bordbar, Sage Hart and San Bolkan
Additional contact information
Darrin J. Griffin: The University of Alabama
Zachary W. Arth: Marist College
Samuel D. Hakim: The University of Alabama
Brian C. Britt: The University of Alabama
James N. Gilbreath: University Libraries, The University of Alabama
Mackenzie P. Pike: The University of Texas At Austin
Andrew J. Laningham: The University of Alabama
Fareed Bordbar: The University of Alabama
Sage Hart: The University of Alabama
San Bolkan: California State University Long Beach

Scientometrics, 2021, vol. 126, issue 5, No 30, 4355-4372

Abstract: Abstract To advance bibliometric analyses in the social sciences this study applies a metric to a publication dataset to examine how authorship credit allocation on published manuscripts might influence factors related to proliferation. We utilize a weighted fraction count (WFC) procedure and discuss how this type of method may assist in the evaluation of published research in social science. Using a metric similar to that created by Abbas (2010, 2011) we evaluate a sample of 103 prolific communication scholars’ publication records and illustrate the utility of using a WFC procedure for understanding patterns and trends in communication scholarly production. A strong positive relationship between collaboration and the production of journal articles supported the notion that coauthors may increase proliferation. We also examined gender differences in publishing and coauthoring, with the only difference being that men were more likely to have a higher WFC than women. Additional research questions asked whether scholars’ faculty ranking might influence how they publish and collaborate. Patterns from examining publication data show that senior scholars may tend to publish in a capacity that illustrates they are mentoring younger scholars. The findings of this study illustrate that a WFC procedure for authorship credit allocation already being used in the sciences may be considered for examining prolific scholarship in the social sciences broadly, and the communication discipline specifically.

Keywords: Bibliometrics; Prolific authors; Coauthorship; Citations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-021-03927-w Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1007_s11192-021-03927-w

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11192

DOI: 10.1007/s11192-021-03927-w

Access Statistics for this article

Scientometrics is currently edited by Wolfgang Glänzel

More articles in Scientometrics from Springer, Akadémiai Kiadó
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().