EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Managing publication change at Al-Farabi Kazakh National University: a case study

Renata Kudaibergenova, Sandugash Uzakbay, Asselya Makanova, Kymbat Ramadinkyzy, Erlan Kistaubayev, Ruslan Dussekeev and Kadyrzhan Smagulov ()
Additional contact information
Renata Kudaibergenova: Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Sandugash Uzakbay: Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Asselya Makanova: Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Kymbat Ramadinkyzy: Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Erlan Kistaubayev: Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Ruslan Dussekeev: Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Kadyrzhan Smagulov: Al-Farabi Kazakh National University

Scientometrics, 2022, vol. 127, issue 1, No 18, 453-479

Abstract: Abstract Since 2011, in Kazakhstan, one of the main indicators for assessing the effectiveness of researchers is their publication activity in journals indexed by Scopus. The policy implemented by the government had a positive effect on the growth of the number of publications, however, simultaneously, dishonest practices and the use of questionable journals as channels for publication became widespread. This study identifies how the publication management system at a university in Kazakhstan is changing the publication strategies of its staff. The study was conducted based on the data of the internal rating conducted by Al-Farabi Kazakh National University (KazNU) during 2015–2019. Such data were obtained using an automated publication tracking system based on API Scopus. This study shows that introduction of mechanisms aimed to stimulate publication activity in KazNU had a positive effect on the research productivity, but simultaneously led to attempts to manipulate rating indicators on the part of individual researchers. The introduction of indicators based on the quality and impact metrics of the journals, in turn, positively influenced the publication strategy in terms of choice of journals and decrease of publications in journals with dubious reputations. The study results can be used to develop a strategy for publication activity in a university, especially in developing countries faced with publication inflation, an unprecedented increase in publications in “predatory” journals, and the emergence of dishonest practices aimed at manipulating bibliometric indicators.

Keywords: Management model; Publication activity; Internal rating; Monetary reward; Publication strategies; Al-Farabi KazNU (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-021-04139-y Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:scient:v:127:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-021-04139-y

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11192

DOI: 10.1007/s11192-021-04139-y

Access Statistics for this article

Scientometrics is currently edited by Wolfgang Glänzel

More articles in Scientometrics from Springer, Akadémiai Kiadó
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:127:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-021-04139-y