EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Citation of retracted research: a case-controlled, ten-year follow-up scientometric analysis of Scott S. Reuben’s malpractice

Istvan-Szilard Szilagyi, Gregor A. Schittek, Christoph Klivinyi, Holger Simonis, Torsten Ulrich and Helmar Bornemann-Cimenti ()
Additional contact information
Istvan-Szilard Szilagyi: Medical University of Graz
Gregor A. Schittek: Medical University of Graz
Christoph Klivinyi: Medical University of Graz
Holger Simonis: University Hospital Salzburg
Torsten Ulrich: Graz University of Technology
Helmar Bornemann-Cimenti: Medical University of Graz

Scientometrics, 2022, vol. 127, issue 5, No 19, 2620 pages

Abstract: Abstract A major problem in scientific literature is the citation of retracted research. Until now, no long-term follow-up of the course of citations of such articles has been published. In the present study, we determined the development of citations of retracted articles based on the case of anaesthesiologist and pain researcher Scott S. Reuben, over a period of 10 years and compared them to matched controls. We screened four databases to find retracted publications by Scott S. Ruben and reviewed full publications for indications of retraction status. To obtain a case-controlled analysis, all Reuben’s retracted articles were compared with the respective citations of the preceeding and subsequent neighbouring articles within the same journal. There were 420 citations between 2009 and 2019, of which only 40% indicated the publication being retracted. Over a 10-year period, an increasing linear trend is observed in citations of retracted articles by Scott S. Ruben that are not reported as retracted (R2 = 0.3647). Reuben’s retracted articles were cited 92% more often than the neighbouring non-retracted articles. This study highlights a major scientific problem. Invented or falsified data are still being cited after more than a decade, leading to a distortion of the evidence and scientometric parameters.

Keywords: Retraction of publication; Scientific misconduct; Ethics research; Scott S. Reuben; Pain; Anaesthesiology; Anaesthetist (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-022-04321-w Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:scient:v:127:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s11192-022-04321-w

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11192

DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04321-w

Access Statistics for this article

Scientometrics is currently edited by Wolfgang Glänzel

More articles in Scientometrics from Springer, Akadémiai Kiadó
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:127:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s11192-022-04321-w