Scientific elites versus other scientists: who are better at taking advantage of the research collaboration network?

Yun Liu, Mengya Zhang, Gupeng Zhang () and Xiongxiong You
Additional contact information
Yun Liu: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Mengya Zhang: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Gupeng Zhang: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Xiongxiong You: Tianjin University

Scientometrics, 2022, vol. 127, issue 6, No 11, 3145-3166

Abstract: Abstract By collecting the publication data of scientists belonging to China’s Project 985 universities in the chemistry field and classifying the scientists into Distinguished Young Scholars (DYSs) and non-Distinguished Young Scholars (non-DYSs), this study constructed scientists’ ego research collaboration networks and compared the network differences between DYSs and non-DYSs, who usually occupy different structural positions in the science community. We employed three network indicators (degree centrality, betweenness centrality and tie strength) to measure the advantages related to network locations. Then, we investigated and compared DYSs’ and non-DYSs’ capability of using the social capital embedded in their research collaboration networks to improve their research performance. The results show that DYSs exhibit the better capability to use social capital from research collaboration networks and that their Ph.D. mentors may be a critical factor in scientific success. We further discussed the theoretical and practical implications at the end of this study.

Keywords: Scientific elite; Research collaboration network; Research performance; Social capital (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D85 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-022-04362-1 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:scient:v:127:y:2022:i:6:d:10.1007_s11192-022-04362-1

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11192

DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04362-1

Access Statistics for this article

Scientometrics is currently edited by Wolfgang Glänzel

More articles in Scientometrics from Springer, Akadémiai Kiadó
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().