Implementation of a new research indicator to QS ranking system

Ghassan Abdul-Majeed (), Elameer Amer Saleem, Drai A. Smait, Sadiq H. Abdulhussain, Sadiq M. Sait, Hasan S. Majdi, Haydar Abdulameer Marhoon and Waleed Al-Azzawi
Additional contact information
Ghassan Abdul-Majeed: University of Baghdad
Elameer Amer Saleem: University of Information Technology and Communications
Drai A. Smait: University of Mashreq
Sadiq H. Abdulhussain: University of Baghdad
Sadiq M. Sait: King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
Hasan S. Majdi: Al-Mustaqbal University College
Haydar Abdulameer Marhoon: Al-Ayen University

Scientometrics, 2023, vol. 128, issue 2, No 21, 1365 pages

Abstract: Abstract The QS world university rankings employ six indicators with different weights; namely: academic reputation (40%), Employer reputation (10%), research performance (20% which is basically normalized citations per faculty, Faculty/Student Ratio (20%), International Faculty Ratio (5%) and International Student Ratio (5%). In this ranking system, the research performance is calculated by dividing total normalized citations by the number of full time equivalent faculty. Recently, Abdul-Majeed et al. (2021 proposed a new equation for predicting the research performance of universities, using four variables (number of published papers, number of researchers, total citations, number of non-citesd papers). In the present study, we investigate the influence of using Abdul-Majeed et al. equation on the rank of the top 100 universities of QS ranking. Results have shown that replacing the QS research indicator with that suggested by Abdul-Majeed et al. results in an apparent change in the rank of the 100 universities. The rank of 92 universities has been changed through this new proposal. Furthermore, we modify the Abdul-Majeed et al. equation by including reviewing activity based on information extracted from Publons site. Detailed calculations reveal that most of the top 100 universities have low level of reviewing activity. This modification causes a significant variation (the change reaches 98%) in the rank of the top 100 universities.

Keywords: Research performance; QS ranking; Reviewing activity; Citations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-022-04611-3 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:scient:v:128:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-022-04611-3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11192

DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04611-3

Access Statistics for this article

Scientometrics is currently edited by Wolfgang Glänzel

More articles in Scientometrics from Springer, Akadémiai Kiadó
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().