Knowledge-integrated research is more disruptive when supported by homogeneous funding sources: a case of US federally funded research in biomedical and life sciences

Seolmin Yang and So Young Kim ()
Additional contact information
Seolmin Yang: Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
So Young Kim: Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology

Scientometrics, 2023, vol. 128, issue 6, No 2, 3257-3282

Abstract: Abstract Governments commonly support scientific research integrating knowledge of various areas and fields, expecting this to lead to disruptive research. However, empirical evidence is relatively scant regarding whether knowledge-integrated research with government funding disrupts sciences. This study explores the quality of government-funded research in terms of knowledge integration and disruption. Knowledge integration is measured as the degree to which a paper combines different research subjects in three dimensions of diversity—variety, balance, and disparity. Disruption is calculated based on paper citation networks, thereby capturing how the paper challenges existing research streams and provides new directions of scientific research. Our analysis demonstrates that the relationship between knowledge integration and disruption varies by government funding sources, using bibliometric data from US federally funded research published between 1975 and 2005 in biomedical and life sciences. The empirical findings show that: (1) knowledge-integrated research is more disruptive when supported by funding agencies of the same government department rather than of different government departments; and (2) while the effect of knowledge integration on long-term citations is positive and becomes stronger for the studies funded by homogeneous government funding sources, its effect on short-term citations is negative regardless of the source of government funding. These results highlight the potential value of knowledge-integrated research that is hard to capture through short-term performance, which holds significant policy implications for current practices in research evaluations that are driven by short-term evaluation.

Keywords: Knowledge integration; Disruption; Citations; Government funding; Biomedical and life sciences; Research evaluation; 62J12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O38 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-023-04706-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:scient:v:128:y:2023:i:6:d:10.1007_s11192-023-04706-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11192

DOI: 10.1007/s11192-023-04706-5

Access Statistics for this article

Scientometrics is currently edited by Wolfgang Glänzel

More articles in Scientometrics from Springer, Akadémiai Kiadó
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().