Interdisciplinary hierarchical diversity driving disruption

Qian Yu (), Xiuwen Li (), Ding Ma, Li Zhang (), Kexin Chen, Qiang Xue and Qingjie Zhang
Additional contact information
Qian Yu: Provincial Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences for Science & Technology Innovation and Economic Development
Xiuwen Li: Provincial Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences for Science & Technology Innovation and Economic Development
Ding Ma: Provincial Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences for Science & Technology Innovation and Economic Development
Li Zhang: Wuhan University of Technology
Kexin Chen: National Natural Science Foundation of China
Qiang Xue: Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China
Qingjie Zhang: Wuhan University of Technology

Scientometrics, 2024, vol. 129, issue 12, No 15, 7833-7849

Abstract: Abstract The increasingly widespread interdisciplinary intersections contrast with the declining levels of disruption across various disciplinary domains, posing a challenge to the advancement of science and technology. Therefore, How to effectively promote interdisciplinary research to truly achieve disruption has become a key research question in today's scientific and technological development. This study examined team's interdisciplinary patterns from the perspective of hierarchical diversity. The overall disciplinary diversity of teams (defined as $${\text{ID}}\gamma$$ ID γ ) was decomposed into individual interdisciplinary hierarchical diversity (defined as $$\text{ID}\alpha$$ ID α ) and team interdisciplinary hierarchical diversity (defined as $$\text{ID}\beta$$ ID β ). The research proposed a hierarchical decomposition method for measuring disciplinary diversity based on the Shannon information entropy index. Using 1026225 scientific papers from typical interdisciplinary fields of Quantum information, Nanomaterials, and Synthetic biology that span the period 2000–2022. The findings indicate that when $$\text{ID}\beta$$ ID β is more significant than $$\text{ID}\alpha$$ ID α , the team's level of disruption is higher. Moreover, under certain team sizes and disciplinary richness, higher $$\text{ID}\beta$$ ID β leads to a higher level of disruption within the team. Furthermore, this study discovered that teams comprising one generalist (with the highest $$\text{ID}\alpha$$ ID α value) and several specialists (with $$\text{ID}\alpha$$ ID α equal to 0) exhibit significant $$\text{ID}\beta$$ ID β , leading to the highest level of disruption. The study discoveries offer decision-making and policy guidelines for the collaborative patterns and funding strategies in interdisciplinary research for disruption.

Keywords: Interdisciplinary research; Team hierarchical diversity; Individual hierarchical diversity; Disruption (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-024-05184-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:scient:v:129:y:2024:i:12:d:10.1007_s11192-024-05184-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11192

DOI: 10.1007/s11192-024-05184-z

Access Statistics for this article

Scientometrics is currently edited by Wolfgang Glänzel

More articles in Scientometrics from Springer, Akadémiai Kiadó
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().