RCE (rationale–cogency–extent) criterion unravels features affecting citation impact of top-ranked systematic literature reviews: leaving the impression…is all you need

Marko Orošnjak, Branko Štrbac (), Srđan Vulanović, Biserka Runje, Amalija Horvatić Novak and Andrej Razumić
Additional contact information
Marko Orošnjak: University of Novi Sad
Branko Štrbac: University of Novi Sad
Srđan Vulanović: University of Novi Sad
Biserka Runje: University of Zagreb
Amalija Horvatić Novak: University of Zagreb
Andrej Razumić: University of Zagreb

Scientometrics, 2024, vol. 129, issue 3, No 31, 1947 pages

Abstract: Abstract Hijacked from medical and health sciences, Systematic Literature Reviews (SLRs) are widely (ab)used in many scientific domains. Considering the ability to provide transparency and replicability of research results, many scientists consider an SLR a safe avenue for attaining scientific impact, given that the theoretical probability of acceptance is relatively high. Relying on dual analysis of Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) and Network Analysis (NA), the study identifies key features associated with citation impact within top-tier SLRs. Next, the study introduces Rationale, Cogency, and Extent (RCE) criterion for evaluating potential markers that predict citation impact using two case studies of SLRs from engineering domain. The findings suggest that the informal logic for starting a review significantly correlates with citation impact. Additionally, journal- and author-level metrics, along with RCE composite scores, display significant difference between top- and bottom-ranked SLRs. Through NA, reporting the quality assessment of studies (QATR) emerges as the most influential node within the RCE network. Despite its lack of direct correlation with citation impact, we conclude that QATR is a moderating variable. Finally, the study concludes that a well-articulated research question, alignment with existing evidence, and rigorous data use collectively serve as a blueprint for producing a high-quality SLR.

Keywords: Rationale–cogency–extent criterion; Scientometrics; Partial least squares discriminant analysis; Network analysis; Systematic literature reviews; Citation impact (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-024-04935-2 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:scient:v:129:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-024-04935-2

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11192

DOI: 10.1007/s11192-024-04935-2

Access Statistics for this article

Scientometrics is currently edited by Wolfgang Glänzel

More articles in Scientometrics from Springer, Akadémiai Kiadó
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().