Comparing examiner citations and applicant citations: insights into technology evolution

Yali Qiao, Alan L. Porter, Ying Huang (), Haiyun Xu and Xuefeng Wang
Additional contact information
Yali Qiao: Chinese Academy of Sciences
Alan L. Porter: Search Technology, Inc.
Ying Huang: Wuhan University
Haiyun Xu: Shandong University of Technology
Xuefeng Wang: Beijing Institute of Technology

Scientometrics, 2025, vol. 130, issue 2, No 1, 537-563

Abstract: Abstract Patent citation data is widely used in the study of technology evolution, but existing research has overlooked an issue that there may be potential differences between examiner citations and applicant citations, which may introduce biases from examiner citations. Yet, there is still a lack of systematic comparative study on the differences between applicant citations and examiner citations for technology evolution. To address this, we conducted a comprehensive comparison using USPTO patent data across four dimensions: technology profiling, technology relevance, technology diversity, and technology evolution pathways. For our case study, we selected the promising research area of photovoltaic cells. After comparing nine sub-technologies in this area, we have drawn some conclusions: (1) Applicants tend to provide more citations than examiners, and examiners tend to cite more recent patents than applicants; (2) There is no apparent inclination for applicants to avoid citing particularly relevant patents. On average, examiner citations are slightly closer in technological proximity to their invention than those cited by applicants; (3) The degree of diversity for applicant citations, examiner citations, and applicant & examiner citations at a single patent level lacks consistency. However, their average trend by year or by sub-technology is similar after adding examiner citations; (4) Merging family members strongly impacts main pathways through added examiner citations, which is quite contrary in the citation network with only USPTO-granted patents without merging patent members; (5) In sub-technologies at the growth stage, applicants and examiners both cite more recent patents and tend to integrate border technologies from other fields, which can be used as an indicator for evaluating the potential to become emerging. The findings remind us to pay extra attention to the context in which citation data is used to measure technology evolution, and can serve as signals for technology assessment as well.

Keywords: Patent citation analysis; Examiner citation; Applicant citation; Technology diversity; Main path analysis; Photovoltaic cells (PV) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-025-05245-x Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05245-x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11192

DOI: 10.1007/s11192-025-05245-x

Access Statistics for this article

Scientometrics is currently edited by Wolfgang Glänzel

More articles in Scientometrics from Springer, Akadémiai Kiadó
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().