Do researchers from prestigious universities deserve advantages in research funding? Evidence from the National Natural Science Foundation of China

Shuwen Wang, Minglu Li, Jianping Li and Dengsheng Wu ()
Additional contact information
Shuwen Wang: Chinese Academy of Sciences
Minglu Li: National Natural Science Foundation of China
Jianping Li: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Dengsheng Wu: Shenzhen University

Scientometrics, 2025, vol. 130, issue 3, No 12, 1587-1615

Abstract: Abstract Existing literature underscores the unequal distribution of research funding across universities of varying prestige, yet the mechanisms through which university prestige influences funding success remain underexplored. Specifically, do Principal Investigators (PIs) from universities of differing prestige levels face divergent probabilities of funding success? Is this disparity solely attributable to differences in research capabilities, or does university prestige independently confer advantages, even among PIs with comparable qualifications? This study addresses these questions by analyzing unique application data from the National Natural Science Foundation of China, employing a combination of baseline regression models, matching methods, and panel data techniques. The results indicate that university prestige significantly increases the likelihood of funding success, even when controlling for the applicant’s research background. Furthermore, among awarded grants, the prestige of the PI’s affiliated university positively influences both academic productivity and scientific impact. Early-career affiliation with prestigious universities is also strongly linked to higher academic output and sustained funding acquisition, suggesting a “richer-get-richer” dynamic. By elucidating the mechanisms behind funding decisions, this study contributes to the theoretical understanding of research funding allocation and provides empirical insights for optimizing funding policy.

Keywords: Research funding; Matthew effect; University prestige; Scientific output; National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-025-05278-2 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05278-2

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11192

DOI: 10.1007/s11192-025-05278-2

Access Statistics for this article

Scientometrics is currently edited by Wolfgang Glänzel

More articles in Scientometrics from Springer, Akadémiai Kiadó
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().