Research productivity and novelty under different funding models: evidence from NIH-funded research projects
Linming Xu,
Baicun Li,
Shuo Chen () and
Meijuan Li
Additional contact information
Linming Xu: Fujian University of Technology
Baicun Li: Chinese Academy of Sciences
Shuo Chen: State University of New York College at Geneseo
Meijuan Li: Fuzhou University
Scientometrics, 2025, vol. 130, issue 7, No 18, 3743-3771
Abstract:
Abstract This study examines research productivity and novelty under different funding mechanisms of the National Institute of Health (NIH). We analyze two layers of funding relationships: (1) intramural versus extramural funding, comparing stable and competitive funding models, and (2) project grants versus cooperative agreements within extramural funding, assessing human capital input and financial investment. Our findings show that competitive extramural funding is associated with higher publication volumes, while stable intramural funding is linked to outputs with greater novelty. Within extramural mechanisms, cooperative agreements are associated with more publications than project grants, primarily due to larger collaborative group sizes rather than increased financial input. However, cooperative agreements are linked to lower research novelty, largely due to greater financial investment. These results highlight the importance of aligning human and financial resources to optimize research outcomes. A balanced approach between intramural and extramural funding mechanisms can support both productivity and innovation.
Keywords: Scientific funding; Funding models; Research productivity; Novelty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I23 O38 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-025-05370-7 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05370-7
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11192
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-025-05370-7
Access Statistics for this article
Scientometrics is currently edited by Wolfgang Glänzel
More articles in Scientometrics from Springer, Akadémiai Kiadó
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().