EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The impact of scientific articles on Chinese social media: examining its correlation with novelty and citations

Yuanyuan Zhou and Jiaojiao Ji ()
Additional contact information
Yuanyuan Zhou: University of Science and Technology of China
Jiaojiao Ji: University of Science and Technology of China

Scientometrics, 2025, vol. 130, issue 8, No 16, 4619 pages

Abstract: Abstract Measuring the influence of scientific articles has become a critical component of evaluating their value. Beyond existing indicators such as citation counts and novelty, the social media impact of scientific articles is gaining recognition as an important metric. However, the relationship between social media impact and existing indicators remains unclear. In particular, the correlation between social media impact and the novelty of scientific articles has not been thoroughly explored, and the correlation between social media impact and citation counts varies across research fields and post-publication stages. To address these gaps, we analyzed 5162 scientific articles mentioned by the Chinese Academy of Sciences on Weibo. Our study examined the correlation between social media impact and novelty across five research fields, as well as the correlation between social media impact and citation counts across five research fields and nine post-publication stages. We found no significant correlation between social media impact and novelty in any research field. Additionally, we observed a weak but significant correlation between social media impact and citation counts in natural sciences and engineering and technology, but no significant correlation in medical and health sciences, agricultural and veterinary sciences, or social sciences. Furthermore, social media impact was weakly correlated with citation counts across most post-publication stages, except at the nine-year stage. These findings provide valuable insights into the role of social media impact in evaluating the influence of scientific articles, highlighting its potential as a complementary metric in research evaluation.

Keywords: Citation counts; Social media impact; Novelty; Research field; Post-publication stage (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-025-05383-2 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:8:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05383-2

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11192

DOI: 10.1007/s11192-025-05383-2

Access Statistics for this article

Scientometrics is currently edited by Wolfgang Glänzel

More articles in Scientometrics from Springer, Akadémiai Kiadó
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-08-28
Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:8:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05383-2