Authorship and citation patterns in Management Science in comparison with operational research

Hajime Eto ()
Additional contact information
Hajime Eto: Chiba Keizai University

Scientometrics, 2002, vol. 53, issue 3, No 5, 337-349

Abstract: Abstract The authorship and citation patterns in the journal titled Management Science (MS) are analysed. The purpose of the analysis is to examine the competitive relation of MS with OR (operational research or operations research). The analysis is focused on the use of mathematical methods, because MS entered the management research area by using mathematical methods developed by OR and because the use of mathematical methods in real management is facing difficulties. The relationship of MS with information systems (IS) and organisation research (Org) is analysed in regard to the competition of MS with OR. The analysis reveals the intermediate character of MS; that is, MS is less prone to mathematical methods and is more inclined towards IS and Org than OR is.

Date: 2002
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1014821012420 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:scient:v:53:y:2002:i:3:d:10.1023_a:1014821012420

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11192

DOI: 10.1023/A:1014821012420

Access Statistics for this article

Scientometrics is currently edited by Wolfgang Glänzel

More articles in Scientometrics from Springer, Akadémiai Kiadó
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().