Potential science-technology spillovers in regions: An insight on geographic co-location of knowledge activities in the EU
Michel Zitt (),
Suzy Ramanana-Rahary,
Elise Bassecoulard and
Françoise Laville
Additional contact information
Michel Zitt: Observatoire des Sciences et des Techniques (OST) Lereco
Suzy Ramanana-Rahary: Observatoire des Sciences et des Techniques (OST) Lereco
Elise Bassecoulard: Université de Nantes
Françoise Laville: Observatoire des Sciences et des Techniques (OST) Lereco
Scientometrics, 2003, vol. 57, issue 2, No 10, 295-320
Abstract:
Abstract This article depicts some features of the geography of science and technology outputs in the EU, with a particular attention to regional “co-location” of these two pillars of the “knowledge-based society”. Economists have, for a decade, paid great attention to local “spillovers” stating that industrial firms often draw advantages from the presence of nearby academic centres. The presence in the same areas of strong academic and technological resources is both a condition and a result of science-technology interactions. Concentrating on publications and patents as proxies of the science and technology level in regions, we built a typology of regions according to their commitment to the two knowledge-base activities and then analysed the co-locations of science and technology from several points of view. A fine-grain lattice, mainly based on standard Nuts3 level, was used. Co-location, at the EU level, is not a general rule. A strong potential for spillover/ interaction does exist in the top-class regions which concentrate a high proportion of European S and T output. But for regions with a small/medium level of S&T activity, a divergence of orientations appears between a science-oriented family and a technology-oriented family, indicating an imbalance between local S and T resources. If we look at the S-oriented regions, whilst controlling for underlying factors, such as population and regional economic product, a significant geographic linkage between T and S appears. This suggests a trajectory of science-based technological development. A careful examination of S&T thematic alignments and specialisation is necessary to develop the hypothesis that fostering academic resources could increase the technological power along a growth path.
Date: 2003
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1024145920210 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:scient:v:57:y:2003:i:2:d:10.1023_a:1024145920210
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11192
DOI: 10.1023/A:1024145920210
Access Statistics for this article
Scientometrics is currently edited by Wolfgang Glänzel
More articles in Scientometrics from Springer, Akadémiai Kiadó
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().