Self-citations at the meso and individual levels: effects of different calculation methods

Rodrigo Costas (), Thed N. Leeuwen and María Bordons
Additional contact information
Rodrigo Costas: Instituto de Estudios Documentales sobre Ciencia y Tecnología (IEDCYT), Centre for Human and Social Sciences (CCHS), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)
Thed N. Leeuwen: Leiden University
María Bordons: Instituto de Estudios Documentales sobre Ciencia y Tecnología (IEDCYT), Centre for Human and Social Sciences (CCHS), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)

Scientometrics, 2010, vol. 82, issue 3, No 8, 517-537

Abstract: Abstract This paper focuses on the study of self-citations at the meso and micro (individual) levels, on the basis of an analysis of the production (1994–2004) of individual researchers working at the Spanish CSIC in the areas of Biology and Biomedicine and Material Sciences. Two different types of self-citations are described: author self-citations (citations received from the author him/herself) and co-author self-citations (citations received from the researchers’ co-authors but without his/her participation). Self-citations do not play a decisive role in the high citation scores of documents either at the individual or at the meso level, which are mainly due to external citations. At micro-level, the percentage of self-citations does not change by professional rank or age, but differences in the relative weight of author and co-author self-citations have been found. The percentage of co-author self-citations tends to decrease with age and professional rank while the percentage of author self-citations shows the opposite trend. Suppressing author self-citations from citation counts to prevent overblown self-citation practices may result in a higher reduction of citation numbers of old scientists and, particularly, of those in the highest categories. Author and co-author self-citations provide valuable information on the scientific communication process, but external citations are the most relevant for evaluative purposes. As a final recommendation, studies considering self-citations at the individual level should make clear whether author or total self-citations are used as these can affect researchers differently.

Keywords: Self-citations; Micro-level; Meso-level; Individual scientists; Bibliometric indicators; Citation analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (37)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-010-0187-7 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:scient:v:82:y:2010:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-010-0187-7

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11192

DOI: 10.1007/s11192-010-0187-7

Access Statistics for this article

Scientometrics is currently edited by Wolfgang Glänzel

More articles in Scientometrics from Springer, Akadémiai Kiadó
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().