Ranking Karnataka Districts by the Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) and by Applying Simple Elements of Partial Order Theory

Tugce Beycan (), B. P. Vani (), Rainer Bruggemann () and Christian Suter ()
Additional contact information
Tugce Beycan: University of Neuchâtel
B. P. Vani: Institute for Social and Economic Change
Rainer Bruggemann: Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries
Christian Suter: University of Neuchâtel

Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, 2019, vol. 143, issue 1, No 9, 173-200

Abstract: Abstract This study focuses on the Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) ranking. The standard ranking process of the MPI produces a single total (linear) rank of units by simply ordering them from the best to the worst (or the inverse) as a function of their MPI score. However, units are not necessarily comparable regarding all 10 indicators simultaneously on which the MPI is based. We use the 2012/13 India District Level Household Survey wave four with a special focus on the State of Karnataka. By using partial order theory (i.e. the Hasse Diagram technique and the software package PyHasse), we found that, in Karnataka, the number of incomparabilities greatly exceeds the number of comparabilities. This indicates that the aggregation process leading to the MPI hides the individual role of indicators. We utilized a number of tools in partial order theory to analyze the comparabilities and incomparabilities. This included local partial order, antichain, and average height analysis. In contrast with the standard MPI ranking, partial order theory provides average height which does not only account for comparable districts, but also considers to what extent incomparable districts influence the position of a district in the ranking. We found that the results of partial order ranking deviate considerably from those of the MPI ranking. Given the extent of incomparabilities, for most of our sample, the MPI ranking does not provide an adequate ranking. The Hasse Diagram technique, can therefore be seen as a synthetic ranking tool or a robustness tool that complements the standard ranking process of the MPI.

Keywords: Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI); Partial order theory; Alkire and Foster method; PyHasse; Karnataka (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-018-1966-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:soinre:v:143:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11205-018-1966-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11135

DOI: 10.1007/s11205-018-1966-4

Access Statistics for this article

Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement is currently edited by Filomena Maggino

More articles in Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().