Voluntary Pensions Development and the Adequacy of the Mandatory Pension System: Is There a Trade-Off?

Edyta Marcinkiewicz ()
Additional contact information
Edyta Marcinkiewicz: Lodz University of Technology

Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, 2019, vol. 143, issue 2, No 8, 609-636

Abstract: Abstract The policy-makers’ efforts to increase the role of voluntary pension systems observed in many countries reflect a more general tendency, which is the privatisation of social risks. The paper examines, from a comparative perspective, to what extent European countries have privatised their pensions in terms of voluntary pension systems. It aggregates and reports data on the assets, membership, and contributions in various pension plans across 20 European countries. To assess the overall relevance of voluntary pension systems in the studied countries, it proposes the Voluntary Pensions Index (VPI), which allows for cross-country comparisons. The paper analyses the relationship between the development of voluntary pensions and pension benefit adequacy in the mandatory schemes form two perspectives: current workers and current beneficiaries. The empirical results suggest that various levels of VPI in the countries studied can be explained by the differences in the pension systems generosity, but only towards the current working-age generation. In countries where the mandatory pension benefits are expected to be smaller, the supplementary pensions play a greater role. The results also imply that in countries with a flatter pension benefit formula adopted in the mandatory system, voluntary pensions are better developed. The adequacy of pension benefits from the mandatory system, as seen from the current beneficiaries’ perspective, does not seem to have an impact on the amount of savings and participation in the voluntary programmes.

Keywords: Pension adequacy; Voluntary pensions; Private pensions; Cross-country studies; Occupational plans; Personal plans (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-018-2001-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:soinre:v:143:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s11205-018-2001-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11135

DOI: 10.1007/s11205-018-2001-5

Access Statistics for this article

Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement is currently edited by Filomena Maggino

More articles in Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().