Developing a New Index of Rurality for Exploring Variations in Health Outcomes in Auckland and Northland

Jinfeng Zhao (), Shanthi Ameratunga (), Arier Lee (), Michael Browne () and Daniel J. Exeter ()
Additional contact information
Jinfeng Zhao: The University of Auckland
Shanthi Ameratunga: The University of Auckland
Arier Lee: The University of Auckland
Michael Browne: The University of Auckland
Daniel J. Exeter: The University of Auckland

Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, 2019, vol. 144, issue 2, No 18, 955-980

Abstract: Abstract Health inequalities between urban and rural areas are prevalent in many countries. However, rurality is a multifaceted concept so it is important to specify which aspects of rurality are most relevant to the analysis of urban/rural health disparities. Drawing from international research, we identified four domains that are most relevant to measuring rurality: (1) access to service facilities; (2) percentage of natural space; (3) population density; and (4) percentage of people employed in farming-related occupations. For the Auckland and Northland regions of New Zealand, we calculated a score for each of the four domains and combined them into a multi-dimensional index of relative rurality for health research using network analysis and various statistical approaches. We further developed an urban/rural typology that characterises urban and rural areas using quantitative criteria including thresholds and different combinations of domains and indicators of rurality. The rurality index, the typology and existing classifications were assessed in relation to all-cause mortality. The findings of this preliminary study provide useful insights into the potential benefits of a conceptually rigorous, granular and multi-dimensional index which incorporates characteristics that can differentiate levels of rurality in New Zealand more than existing classifications. Validation studies and assessment of associations with specific health outcomes would be useful next steps in considering the utility of this rurality index for New Zealand more generally.

Keywords: Rurality index; Urban/rural typology; Health research; New Zealand (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-019-02076-1 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:soinre:v:144:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s11205-019-02076-1

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11135

DOI: 10.1007/s11205-019-02076-1

Access Statistics for this article

Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement is currently edited by Filomena Maggino

More articles in Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().