EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Testing Equality of Functions Across Multiple Experimental Conditions for Different Ability Levels in the IRT Context: The Case of the IPRASE TLT 2016 Survey

Fabrizio Maturo (), Francesca Fortuna () and Tonio Di Battista ()
Additional contact information
Fabrizio Maturo: “G. d’ Annunzio” University
Francesca Fortuna: “G. d’ Annunzio” University
Tonio Di Battista: “G. d’ Annunzio” University

Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, 2019, vol. 146, issue 1, No 3, 19-39

Abstract: Abstract In the educational field, it is common to analyze test data through item response theory models. In this context, a key role is played by item characteristic curves (ICCs) and item information curves (IICs). In many real cases, practitioners are interested in understanding if some factors have a significant influence on the probability of correctly answering items. In the literature, this problem has been addressed by applying the standard analysis of variance model, which is based on the total scores or the proportion of correct responses. However, this method needs to meet some strong assumptions and may present some limitations because it does not consider useful information typical of the IRT, such as the shapes of the ICCs and IICs, which provide interesting insights for different ability levels. To overcome these issues, this research suggests the use of the functional analysis of variance approach and a novel functional tool in the IRT context. The main advantages of this approach are that it is distribution-free and allows us to check the degree of consistency with the hypothesis of equality among mean curves for different ability levels. Specifically, the proposed method is applied on ICCs and IICs for improving the existing techniques in the educational studies. A real dataset drawn from the IPRASE Trentino Language Testing Survey 2016 is considered. The final purpose of this study is to provide additional tools for scholars and practitioners in defining specific educational plans.

Keywords: IRT; ICC; IIC; FANOVA; P-Statistic (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-018-1893-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:soinre:v:146:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11205-018-1893-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11135

DOI: 10.1007/s11205-018-1893-4

Access Statistics for this article

Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement is currently edited by Filomena Maggino

More articles in Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:146:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11205-018-1893-4