Design and Application of an Area-Level Suicide Risk Index with Spatial Correlation

Jaesang Sung, Qihua Qiu (), Will Davis and Rusty Tchernis
Additional contact information
Jaesang Sung: Georgia State University
Qihua Qiu: Augusta University
Will Davis: Mississippi State University

Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, 2022, vol. 161, issue 1, No 5, 77-104

Abstract: Abstract In this study, we design a novel model-based Suicide Risk Index to assess and identify area-level suicide risk. We construct a Bayesian Spatial Factor Analysis model, treating suicide risk as an underlying latent factor that manifests through multiple observable variables. Our method is applied to county-level data from multiple sources in Florida and Georgia. We utilize 14 manifest variables classified into three dimensions: “suicidal behavior”, “mental illness”, and “substance abuse.” The posterior means and 95% credible intervals of the model-based SRI ranks are estimated. Our results show substantial disagreement between the SRI rankings and age-adjusted suicide rate which only captures reported suicides. Furthermore, we find strong evidence of spatial spillovers in suicide risk across counties. The “mental illness” dimension of our model represents the greatest contribution to county suicide risk in Florida while the “suicidal behavior” dimension accounts for the most variation in suicide risk in Georgia. We also test the sensitivity of our model-based SRI ranks to an alternative spatial correlation specification and different methods for imputing missing data. Finally, we show that greater deprivation and social fragmentation, each estimated using the same SFA model, are positively associated with suicide risk. Our findings suggest that existing suicide prevention guidelines used by policymakers to identify high-risk counties based on suicide death rates may be misleading. The model-based SRI identifies counties with both high suicide risks and greater likelihoods of transferring their risks across county borders. Policy may benefit from singling out these counties for aid and targeted interventions.

Keywords: Suicide risk index; Factor analysis; Spatial dependency; Suicidal ideation; Mental illness; Substance abuse (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-021-02795-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:soinre:v:161:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s11205-021-02795-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11135

DOI: 10.1007/s11205-021-02795-4

Access Statistics for this article

Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement is currently edited by Filomena Maggino

More articles in Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().