Assessment of Urban Quality of Life Index at Local Scale with Different Weighting Approaches

Rabia Bovkir (), Eda Ustaoglu () and Arif Cagdas Aydinoglu ()
Additional contact information
Rabia Bovkir: Gebze Technical University
Eda Ustaoglu: Gebze Technical University
Arif Cagdas Aydinoglu: Gebze Technical University

Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, 2023, vol. 165, issue 2, No 12, 655-678

Abstract: Abstract The rapid increase of population and urban growth have caused huge challenges in ensuring and sustaining environmental and life quality in megacities. In this context, determining, measuring, and analysing the elements that influence city quality of life (QoL) have become important for sustainable urban growth and development. There is a growing interest in QoL assessments, yet reliable and transparent knowledge about the methodology is limited. In this regard, this study aims to contribute to the literature by achieving two distinctive objectives: (1) providing a methodology for investigating the robustness of different weighting approaches to produce a comprehensive and adaptable process for the construction of composite indicators; (2) measuring the urban quality of life at neighbourhood level by including geographical data. Data-dependent statistical methods i.e. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Entropy; and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) techniques i.e. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Best–Worst Method (BWM) were applied to provide objective and subjective weighting approaches, respectively when calculating the urban quality of life (UQoL) index. The findings showed that there is no considerable difference in the pattern and overall ratio of the weights calculated from different methods; nevertheless, the degree of the weights varies according to the applied method. The results from sensitivity analysis applied to the selected indicator weights covering each method used in the analysis represent the effect of alternative criteria weights on the overall results and the findings point to the weakness of data-dependent methods. The study’s methodology can be applied to similar situations at local, regional, and global scales.

Keywords: Quality-of-life (QoL); Composite indicators; Weighting techniques; Multi-criteria decision analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-022-03036-y Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:soinre:v:165:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11205-022-03036-y

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11135

DOI: 10.1007/s11205-022-03036-y

Access Statistics for this article

Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement is currently edited by Filomena Maggino

More articles in Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().