Recalculation of the Human Development Index via Multiplicative Data Envelopment Analysis

Ayça Özekin ()
Additional contact information
Ayça Özekin: Bandırma Onyedi Eylül University

Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, 2024, vol. 175, issue 1, No 11, 217-245

Abstract: Abstract The human development index (HDI) of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) has been subject to criticism since 1990 due to several reasons. These include the way it calculates sub-dimension indices from raw data, its method of combining these indices, and the equal weight it assigns to each sub-dimension. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) models address these criticisms by reevaluating the human development index, resolving dependency concerns, and enabling direct data extraction. Furthermore, advancements in DEA techniques have resulted in alternative models that are more appropriate for calculating HDI. The study aims to recalculate the Human Development Index of 2019 for 189 countries using the Multiplicative Non-parametric Corporate Performance Model. This model, based on multiplicative data envelopment analysis and commonly used to create composite indices from ratio data, is the basis of the study. The evaluation will assess the correlation between the MNCP model results and the values of the human development index within the framework of transforming the income level into human development. Tests of correlation between the MNCP model results and the HDI values show that the correlation coefficients are positive and statistically significant for all income-level countries, despite the observation of significant average rank differences in lower-income and higher-income countries. In line with our expectations, rearranging the weight of the sub-dimensions in the MNCP model can alter countries’ rankings, according to the findings. Nevertheless, the strong correlation values indicate that instead of focusing solely on developing a new method of calculation, it is important to underline the need to reflect on the sub-indicators used in the current HDI calculation, especially those that are open to debate, such as income.

Keywords: Human development index; MNCP model; Multiplicative data envelopment analysis; Sub-dimensions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-024-03441-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:soinre:v:175:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11205-024-03441-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11135

DOI: 10.1007/s11205-024-03441-5

Access Statistics for this article

Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement is currently edited by Filomena Maggino

More articles in Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().