Authentic and Non-authentic Benevolence: Self-Determination Theory as a Framework to Establish Links to Well-Being

Annie Paquet (), Fabien Fenouillet, Charles Martin-Krumm, John-Tyler Binfet and Yvan Paquet
Additional contact information
Annie Paquet: Université Paris Nanterre
Fabien Fenouillet: Université Paris Nanterre
Charles Martin-Krumm: École de Psychologues Praticiens de I’Institut Catholique de Paris, APEMAC, Université de Lorraine
John-Tyler Binfet: University of British Columbia
Yvan Paquet: Université de la Réunion

Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, 2025, vol. 178, issue 1, No 8, 163-184

Abstract: Abstract Prosocial motivations and their consequences are generally explored along two axes: (1) their degree of autonomy/control; and (2) their degree of altruism/selfishness. This study combined these dichotomies to elucidate the theoretical concept of authentic benevolence (defined as benevolence where the individual acts autonomously without expectation of reciprocity, thus completely altruistically); and to explore the effects of benevolence motivations on well-being by creating the Benevolence Motivation Scale (BMS). To this end, 409 participants aged between 17 and 77 years took part in a cross-sectional study and completed various well-being measures, including the BMS. An exploratory-confirmatory factor analysis and second-order analyses showed that a model with two latent second-order factors, named authentic benevolence and non-authentic benevolence, fit the data. Correlational analyses highlighted that only authentic benevolence was positively related to authenticity, empathy, life satisfaction, positive emotions, psychological fulfillment and satisfying social relationships; whereas non-authentic benevolence was negatively correlated with authenticity, life satisfaction and positive emotions. Findings from structural equation modeling supported: (1) the positive impact of authentic benevolence on positive and negative emotions, and the negative impact of non-authentic benevolence on positive emotions; and (2) the effects of satisfying the basic needs described by Self Determination Theory on the adoption of one of the two forms of benevolence. The findings are discussed within the broader context of prosocial motivations.

Keywords: Authentic benevolence; Kindness; Motivations; Self-determination theory; Well-being (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-025-03569-y Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:soinre:v:178:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11205-025-03569-y

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11135

DOI: 10.1007/s11205-025-03569-y

Access Statistics for this article

Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement is currently edited by Filomena Maggino

More articles in Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().