Geographies of feeling stuck behind and populist voting in The Netherlands

Annie Tubadji (), Martijn Burger and Don J. Webber ()
Additional contact information
Annie Tubadji: University of Swansea
Don J. Webber: University of Sheffield

Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, 2025, vol. 179, issue 1, No 21, 549-579

Abstract: Abstract This article adds to the debate on the polarization of modern society by examining whether two principal theories, ‘voting with their feet’ and feelings of being ‘left behind’, can jointly explain the rise in the radical-right and radical-left vote shares across The Netherlands in regional, national, and European elections between 2009–2019. We propose a social-indicators-driven model, activating a Tiebout-Hirschman-Rothschild (THR) mechanism of radicalization triggered by perceived relative local deprivation, which we test empirically. The THR mechanism offers a cultural-filtering explanation for shaping feelings of being ‘stuck behind’ in a ‘left behind’ place which leads to radical voting behaviour. Using the THR model, we assess if the rise of radical-right and radical-left in the Netherlands is a function of the share of net migration in the locality, provision of public goods, and public spending on cultural public goods. Results reveal that inhabitants in municipalities with lower cultural expenditures and a relative decline of the Dutch population have a higher propensity to vote for right-wing radical political parties, thereby underscoring that cultural inequalities underpin political polarization. Both left and right vote shares are sensitive to this THR mechanism, demonstrating that political radicalization has a common cultural root. Although a decrease in general public spending affects voters’ utility functions and voting behaviour, it is the lack of cultural public spending that provides a separate mechanism which triggers the radicalized (more intensive) vote.

Keywords: Tunnel effect; ‘Stuck behind’; Radical voting; Relative deprivation; Local context; Cultural public goods (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F63 O15 R11 R12 R23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-025-03628-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:soinre:v:179:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11205-025-03628-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11135

DOI: 10.1007/s11205-025-03628-4

Access Statistics for this article

Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement is currently edited by Filomena Maggino

More articles in Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().