Do Weights and Complex Design Matter in Structural Equation Modeling for Social Studies? An Example of the Political Satisfaction-Political Trust Model

Magdalena Poteralska () and Jolanta Perek-Białas ()
Additional contact information
Magdalena Poteralska: Warsaw School of Economics
Jolanta Perek-Białas: Warsaw School of Economics

Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, 2025, vol. 179, issue 2, No 13, 923-953

Abstract: Abstract The analyses applying complex design and weighting techniques in Structural Equation Modeling, which encompass both theoretical considerations, practical limitations and possibilities within available statistical software, still appear to be limited — despite the topic not being new. Using the European Social Survey (ESS) and Multigroup Confirmatory Factor Analysis (MGCFA) on political satisfaction and political trust, the estimation consequences of four complex sample analysis scenarios are demonstrated. These include a naïve approach and those adjusted with sampling weights and design variables using two software packages: Mplus8.4 and Stata18. Based on the literature review, only a few studies have included detailed information about the weighting approach in the analyses performed. The absence of this information could affect the accuracy of results and the replication of estimations, as shown in this paper. Empirically, it is demonstrated that assuming a simple random sample in MGCFA can result in divergent coefficients, biased estimates of latent covariances and mean differences, and underestimated standard errors. These in turn affect confidence intervals, goodness-of-fit indices, composite reliability, and convergent validity metrics, potentially undermining the validity of the research design and results, the reliability of inferences, and the comparability of outcomes across countries. Additionally, it was illustrated how results vary when using different software packages under similar estimation settings. In conclusion, there is an urgent need for all researchers who apply complex sample analysis in their work, using weights and design variables, to clearly present their applied approach to analyses, depending on the software used.

Keywords: Complex design; European Social Survey; Political satisfaction; Political trust; Structural equation modeling; Weighting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-025-03618-6 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:soinre:v:179:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11205-025-03618-6

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11135

DOI: 10.1007/s11205-025-03618-6

Access Statistics for this article

Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement is currently edited by Filomena Maggino

More articles in Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().