Mapping Regional Variability Using a Perceived Urbanization Gradient: Beyond the Urban-Rural Binary with the Visual Self-Placement Scale

Dionyssios Askitis ()
Additional contact information
Dionyssios Askitis: University of Vienna

Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, 2025, vol. 179, issue 3, No 14, 1487-1513

Abstract: Abstract This paper focuses on how novel conceptions of urbanization, rurality and its measurement can aid in the detection of regional variability in social indicators such as well-being. While prevailing objective, categorical and text-based typologies of space tend to be limited by issues of zoning and scaling of space, this paper sets out to validate the newly developed visual Self-Placement Scale (SPS) by comparing its tracking of the regional distribution of well-being with that of objective spatial typologies. For this purpose, a nationwide online survey was conducted in Japan, gathering respondents from urban (n = 1500) and rural (n = 1000) municipalities, contrasting the distribution of several well-being measures across administrative, structural, and SPS typologies. Generalized Additive Models revealed that the subjective SPS best predicts various well-being aspects, even when controlling for sociodemographic covariates. The quasi-metric scale helped confirm non-linear distributions of well-being aspects across the urban-rural range of environments invisible to binary spatial typologies. Lastly, merits and issues of the new typology are discussed in light of current cross-regional research. We conclude that while the SPS grapples with limitations related to its subjectivity, it complements and surpasses the binary typologies in predicting wellbeing by quantitatively mapping well-being variability across a broad range of real-world human environments with an intuitive visual self-grading scale. The SPS thus offers easy access to granular spatial information when spatial data availability or resolution are limited, opening the door for future research on the regional variability of other social indicators.

Keywords: Spatial typology; Perceived urbanization; Visual self-rating scale; Degree of urbanization; Regional well-being; Urban-rural gradient (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-025-03667-x Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:soinre:v:179:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11205-025-03667-x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11135

DOI: 10.1007/s11205-025-03667-x

Access Statistics for this article

Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement is currently edited by Filomena Maggino

More articles in Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().