Persistent Trends or Pandemic Effects? A Multi-Cohort Longitudinal Study on Student Well-being, Inequality, and Educational Transitions
Juuso Repo (),
Emil Smith (),
David Reimer () and
Elina Kilpi-Jakonen ()
Additional contact information
Juuso Repo: University of Turku
Emil Smith: Aarhus University
David Reimer: Aarhus University
Elina Kilpi-Jakonen: University of Turku
Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, 2025, vol. 180, issue 1, No 7, 139-158
Abstract:
Abstract This cross-cohort longitudinal study examined changes in student well-being and the relationship between student well-being and educational choice during the COVID-19 pandemic. It compared two during-pandemic cohorts (spanning grades 5–9 from 2017 to 2021 and 2019–2023) to a pre-pandemic cohort (2015–2019), thus accounting for typical age-related trends and pre-pandemic cohort differences before isolating the pandemic’s impact. The study utilized data from the Danish Student School Well-Being Survey (N = 150,733), merged with administrative register data on students’ social background, academic achievement, and transition to upper secondary education. Key outcomes were school connectedness, academic self-efficacy, and educational choice. Results showed that both indicators for student well-being, namely academic self-efficacy and school connectedness, declined across all cohorts, with only minimal differences attributable to the pandemic. Academic self-efficacy and school connectedness in Year 9 were positively associated with an increased likelihood of choosing academic and vocational tracks over leaving the education system. Unexpectedly, the positive association between academic self-efficacy and academic track choice weakened during the pandemic, while the association with school connectedness remained stable. Decomposition analyses showed that academic self-efficacy and school connectedness consistently explained part of the difference in academic track choices between students from different family backgrounds, with little pandemic impact. The findings suggest that studies overlooking typical age-related trends and long-term pre-pandemic trends may have overstated the pandemic’s negative effects. In contrast, our results accounting for these effects, indicate negligible pandemic impacts on academic self-efficacy and school connectedness, and no substantial shift in how they mediate the relationship between family background and educational choice. The results highlight the importance of longitudinal cross-cohort data and the need to consider broader trends in adolescent well-being and educational inequalities.
Keywords: COVID-19; Academic self-efficacy; School Connectedness; Educational Choice; Educational Inequality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-025-03617-7 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:soinre:v:180:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11205-025-03617-7
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11135
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-025-03617-7
Access Statistics for this article
Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement is currently edited by Filomena Maggino
More articles in Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().