From Lifespan Inequality to Lifespan Inequity

Magdalena Muszyńska-Spielauer (), Alyson van Raalte (), Isaac Sasson () and Yukiko Asada ()
Additional contact information
Magdalena Muszyńska-Spielauer: Johannes Kepler University Linz, Institute of Philosophy and Scientific Method and Linz Institute of Transformative Change (LIFT_C)
Alyson van Raalte: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research
Isaac Sasson: Tel Aviv University, Department of Sociology and Anthropology
Yukiko Asada: National Institutes of Health, Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center

Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, 2025, vol. 180, issue 3, No 7, 1449-1473

Abstract: Abstract This article introduces a comprehensive framework for defining and quantifying lifespan inequity within a population, grounded in the capability approach. Lifespan inequity (i.e., unfair inequality) is defined as lifespan deprivation due to premature mortality in a life table distribution of ages at death. We introduce the concept of the Minimally Adequate Length of Life as the threshold distinguishing premature deaths from lifespans of “normal length” and propose to quantify it with the adult modal age at death. Further, we propose to quantify lifespan inequity applying the widely used poverty indices from the Sen-Shorrocks-Thon and Foster-Greer-Thorbecke families, which consider the proportion of the life table cohort who die prematurely (incidence), the extent of their lifespan deprivation (depth), and the distribution of the deprivation among those who die prematurely (distribution). To demonstrate the utility of this approach, we apply the framework to quantify lifespan inequity in the United States from 1933 to 2021 and compare it with levels and trends in other high-income countries. The analysis shows that while US lifespan inequity initially declined faster than in other nations, it stagnated from the 1980s onward, resulting in the highest levels by the 2010s, with the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbating lifespan inequity through a sharp rise in the depth of premature mortality. We demonstrate that the measure of lifespan inequity developed in the proposed framework effectively defines, quantifies, and, therefore, assesses the ethical dimensions of inequality in the length of life within a population. This study highlights the essential interplay between demography and philosophy, as philosophical concepts underpin the assumptions and decisions that shape demographic measures and their interpretations.

Keywords: Lifespan inequity; Premature mortality; Lifespan inequality; Inequity in the length of life; Capability approach (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-025-03711-w Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:soinre:v:180:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11205-025-03711-w

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11135

DOI: 10.1007/s11205-025-03711-w

Access Statistics for this article

Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement is currently edited by Filomena Maggino

More articles in Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().