On winning forecasting competitions in economics
Michael Clements and
David Hendry ()
Spanish Economic Review, 1999, vol. 1, issue 2, 123-160
To explain which methods might win forecasting competitions on economic time series, we consider forecasting in an evolving economy subject to structural breaks, using mis-specified, data-based models. `Causal' models need not win when facing deterministic shifts, a primary factor underlying systematic forecast failure. We derive conditional forecast biases and unconditional (asymptotic) variances to show that when the forecast evaluation sample includes sub-periods following breaks, non-causal models will outperform at short horizons. This suggests using techniques which avoid systematic forecasting errors, including improved intercept corrections. An application to a small monetary model of the UK illustrates the theory.
Keywords: Forecasting; structural breaks; differencing; intercept corrections (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C32 C53 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (26) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:specre:v:1:y:1999:i:2:p:123-160
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... etailsPage=societies
Access Statistics for this article
Spanish Economic Review is currently edited by Eduardo Ley
More articles in Spanish Economic Review from Springer, Spanish Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().