Decision theories and probabilistic insurance: an experimental test
Carmen Herrero (),
Josefa Tomás () and
Antonio Villar ()
Spanish Economic Review, 2006, vol. 8, issue 1, 35-52
This paper reports the results of an experiment in which probabilistic insurance, as proposed by Kahneman and Tversky (1979), is compared both with full insurance and no insurance. The experimental results conform to the intuitive prediction that risk-averse agents who are indifferent between full insurance and no insurance, will prefer full insurance to probabilistic insurance and probabilistic insurance to no insurance. The first conclusion is incompatible with the predictions of expected utility theory, and the second with Kahneman and Tversky's prospect theory. We also show that Loomes and Sudgen's regret theory can easily accommodate these intuitive results. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin/Heidelberg 2006
Keywords: Probabilistic insurance; prospect theory; regret theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:specre:v:8:y:2006:i:1:p:35-52
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... etailsPage=societies
Access Statistics for this article
Spanish Economic Review is currently edited by Eduardo Ley
More articles in Spanish Economic Review from Springer, Spanish Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().