TROM: A Testing-Based Method for Finding Transcriptomic Similarity of Biological Samples

Wei Vivian Li, Yiling Chen and Jingyi Jessica Li ()
Additional contact information
Wei Vivian Li: University of California
Yiling Chen: University of California
Jingyi Jessica Li: University of California

Statistics in Biosciences, 2017, vol. 9, issue 1, No 7, 105-136

Abstract: Abstract Comparative transcriptomics has gained increasing popularity in genomic research thanks to the development of high-throughput technologies including microarray and next-generation RNA sequencing that have generated numerous transcriptomic data. An important question is to understand the conservation and divergence of biological processes in different species. We propose a testing-based method TROM (Transcriptome Overlap Measure) for comparing transcriptomes within or between different species, and provide a different perspective, in contrast to traditional correlation analyses, about capturing transcriptomic similarity. Specifically, the TROM method focuses on identifying associated genes that capture molecular characteristics of biological samples, and subsequently comparing the biological samples by testing the overlap of their associated genes. We use simulation and real data studies to demonstrate that TROM is more powerful in identifying similar transcriptomes and more robust to stochastic gene expression noise than Pearson and Spearman correlations. We apply TROM to compare the developmental stages of six Drosophila species, C. elegans, S. purpuratus, D. rerio and mouse liver, and find interesting correspondence patterns that imply conserved gene expression programs in the development of these species. The TROM method is available as an R package on CRAN ( https://github.com/Vivianstats/TROM ) with manuals and source codes available at http://jsb.ucla.edu/trom-transcriptome-overlap-measure .

Keywords: Transcriptomic similarity measure; Multi-species developmental stages; Robustness to platform differences; Comparative transcriptomics; Microarray vs. RNA-seq; Pearson correlation coefficient; Spearman correlation coefficient; overlap test (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12561-016-9163-y Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:stabio:v:9:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s12561-016-9163-y

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/12561

DOI: 10.1007/s12561-016-9163-y

Access Statistics for this article

Statistics in Biosciences is currently edited by Hongyu Zhao and Xihong Lin

More articles in Statistics in Biosciences from Springer, International Chinese Statistical Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().