EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Benchmarking techniques for reconciling Bayesian small area models at distinct geographic levels

Ryan Janicki () and Andrew Vesper ()
Additional contact information
Ryan Janicki: U.S. Census Bureau
Andrew Vesper: Deloitte Consulting LLP

Statistical Methods & Applications, 2017, vol. 26, issue 4, No 3, 557-581

Abstract: Abstract In sample surveys, there is often insufficient sample size to obtain reliable direct estimates for parameters of interest for certain domains. Precision can be increased by introducing small area models which ‘borrow strength’ by connecting different areas through use of explicit linking models, area-specific random effects, and auxiliary covariate information. One consequence of the use of small area models is that small area estimates at a lower (for example, county) geographic level typically will not aggregate to the estimate at the corresponding higher (for example, state) geographic level. Benchmarking is the statistical procedure for reconciling these differences. This paper provides new perspectives for the benchmarking problem, especially for complex Bayesian small area models which require Markov Chain Monte Carlo estimation. Two new approaches to Bayesian benchmarking are introduced: one procedure based on minimum discrimination information, and another procedure for fully Bayesian self-consistent conditional benchmarking. Notably the proposed procedures construct adjusted posterior distributions whose first and higher order moments are consistent with the benchmarking constraints. It is shown that certain existing benchmarked estimators are special cases of the proposed methodology under normality, giving a distributional justification for the use of benchmarked estimates. Additionally, a ‘flexible’ benchmarking constraint is introduced, where the higher geographic level estimate is not considered fixed, and is simultaneously adjusted, along with lower level estimates.

Keywords: Benchmarking; Small area estimation; Bayesian; Survey data; 62D05; 62F15; 62B10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10260-017-0379-x Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:stmapp:v:26:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10260-017-0379-x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/10260/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10260-017-0379-x

Access Statistics for this article

Statistical Methods & Applications is currently edited by Tommaso Proietti

More articles in Statistical Methods & Applications from Springer, Società Italiana di Statistica
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:stmapp:v:26:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10260-017-0379-x