An Engineering View for Social Systems: Agency as an Operational Principle for Designing Higher Education Access Policies
Adriana Díaz () and
Camilo Olaya ()
Additional contact information
Adriana Díaz: Universidad de los Andes
Camilo Olaya: Universidad de los Andes
Systemic Practice and Action Research, 2017, vol. 30, issue 6, No 4, 627-649
Abstract Access to higher education (HE) has been a persistent concern for governments, practitioners and researchers. Access to HE has been widely studied from scientific perspectives that have focussed on the factors that contribute to the problem; however, authors have highlighted the need for systemic and design perspectives on education systems. The need to connect research with policy remains one of the most challenging issues for education researchers. In view of this gap, this paper argues that engineering thinking and methods represent an opportunity for the design of HE access policies because engineering rationality (distinct from scientific rationalities) matches the concerns and goals of any policymaking attempt. Engineers design artefacts to meet particular goals. These artefacts are artificial systems, tangible or intangible, such as hammers, bridges or whole organizations, which are designed in particular contexts to meet precise goals. Policies for access to HE are good examples of artefacts that seek to fulfil specific needs under concrete constraints inherent to a country or region. More specifically, HE systems are social systems; in other words, they are created and recreated by the interactions and decisions of diverse actors. Hence, to change, redesign or improve such types of systems involves engineering their very interactions that are the outcomes of institutional and human actions. In particular, engineering design requires operational principles. Thus, we propose agency as a fundamental design concept for the improvement of HE systems, which opens new possibilities for a distinct type of policy-making that takes excellent advantage of what engineering can offer, while at the same time expanding on traditional expectations for engineering.
Keywords: Access to higher education; Agency; Design; Engineering; Social systems; Policymaking (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11213-017-9412-0 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:syspar:v:30:y:2017:i:6:d:10.1007_s11213-017-9412-0
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Systemic Practice and Action Research is currently edited by Robert Flood
More articles in Systemic Practice and Action Research from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().