Critical Systems Heuristics: a Systematic Review
Matthew Hutcheson (),
Alec Morton and
Shona Blair
Additional contact information
Matthew Hutcheson: University of Strathclyde
Alec Morton: University of Strathclyde
Shona Blair: University of Strathclyde
Systemic Practice and Action Research, 2024, vol. 37, issue 4, No 7, 499-514
Abstract:
Abstract Critical systems heuristics (CSH) has been influential in the development of critical systems thinking. However, it is a relatively underutilised method compared with soft systems approaches such as soft systems methodology (SSM) and cognitive mapping. This may be in part due to the complexity of ideas underpinning CSH. Core ideas with which users must feel confident include boundary critique, coercion, emancipation, and “is” vs “ought to be” framings. These ideas were the subject of the early discourse surrounding CSH, which considered the role of boundary critique in systems research, the extent to which CSH could meaningfully address coercion, and the claims of CSH as an emancipatory approach. The purpose of this review is to provide clarity on these key concepts by reflecting on how they have been addressed in the CSH literature to date. We find that CSH has been applied in a range of problem contexts and is most frequently applied to address coercion or power asymmetries. CSH research is frequently associated with advocacy for marginalised groups, and we believe this is a natural extension of the methodological emancipation to which CSH aspires. In providing an overview of the key ideas underpinning CSH, we hope to lower the barrier to application for systems researchers and practitioners.
Keywords: Critical systems heuristics; CSH; Boundary critique; Coercion; Action research (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11213-023-09665-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:syspar:v:37:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s11213-023-09665-9
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/11213
DOI: 10.1007/s11213-023-09665-9
Access Statistics for this article
Systemic Practice and Action Research is currently edited by Robert Flood
More articles in Systemic Practice and Action Research from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().