The Participatory Action Researcher: A Starling in the Murmuration

Annet Harten (), Theo J.H. Niessen, Jur J. Koksma and Tineke A. Abma
Additional contact information
Annet Harten: Leiden University Medical Centre
Theo J.H. Niessen: Avans University of Applied Sciences
Jur J. Koksma: Radboud University Medical Center
Tineke A. Abma: Leiden University Medical Centre

Systemic Practice and Action Research, 2025, vol. 38, issue 3, No 3, 18 pages

Abstract: Abstract This paper explores how a participatory action researcher supported transformation across first-, second-, and third-person inquiry levels, informed by social complex adaptive systems (SCAS) theory. Drawing on a participatory action research (PAR) project in a paediatric ward, we describe how change unfolded at personal, interpersonal, and organisational levels. Using a “thinking-with-theory” approach, we analysed narratives as critical friends. We use the metaphor of a starling in a murmuration to describe the researcher’s role: not in control but subtly influencing direction by alternately following and bending the existing interaction patterns. By initiating overlapping circles of interaction, she enabled the emergence of interference leading to improvements at the ward. We conclude that the PAR researcher seized opportunities to act as a messenger for workplace issues related to belonging and authority. This way she paved the way for direct interaction between professional silos on the work floor and parents. Addressing these issues released the energy among nurses and physicians in the research team to engage in constructive conflict. From this conflict, initiatives emerged, interfered, and transformed ward practices. By enduring the discomfort of participating in constructive conflict, alternating between yielding and confronting connection, PAR researchers can influence transformation without controlling it. Our findings contribute to action research theory by demonstrating the usefulness of SCAS theory in revealing patterns and interconnectedness of first-, second- and third-person inquiry, and to SCAS theory by showing how desires for belonging and authority drive cross-professional interaction.

Keywords: Thinking with Theory; Embodied Knowledge; Transformation; Self-reflective Practice; Social Complex Adaptive Systems; Desires; ‘First-; Second- and Third-Person Action Research’ (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11213-025-09727-0 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:syspar:v:38:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11213-025-09727-0

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/11213

DOI: 10.1007/s11213-025-09727-0

Access Statistics for this article

Systemic Practice and Action Research is currently edited by Robert Flood

More articles in Systemic Practice and Action Research from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().